Sui Juris – Response to Contempt of Court
and Judicial Attack
We cringe for people going into court, dealing with the snakes in the outlaw courts of today. So many people are being rendered in the money machine every day, liquidated to the funding streams for the States.
The rendering is in the PROCESS and most people do not have experience to understand or recognize corrupt process when they are in the middle of it. Attorneys do - they created it and don't let everyone in on the secret while you and your family are destroyed.
To help all the people in courts right now who are discovering Sui Juris process and going in without attorneys, they need to know what to say when the judge turns into a raging dragon because they dared to ask a question or try to make the record, and to help keep from being arrested. These tools in particular are used and shared to expose those judges and other court officers who pay little heed, if any at all, to their Oath of Office when they attempt to silence or stiffle your defense of Rights, and the State and U.S Constitutions.
If you know the right words, they back down quickly - they may still have you arrested, but you have said the right words on the record to discredit them in their contemptuous acts against you, and you will use this record in any appeal or future hearings as you go.
The main thing is to DISCREDIT THEM and IMPEACH THEM IN THEIR OWN COURTROOM if you say the right things.
This can be used in any court in any setting, at any level, all the same basic process, we think in any country, with slight variations. Sui Juris process is simple and common law, as any reasonable people would understand and bridges all forms of courts or dealing with public authorities.
One of the main TOOLS they use to arrest you in a courtroom is CONTEMPT OF COURT. Contempt potentially is an instant six months to a year sentence in jail.
They use this for any or no reason, mainly for intimidation. They have already used stun belts or stun guns on defendants who in asking for their Rights irritate the court.
When the court does this to you, (and it happens so fast it makes your head spin), if you have this written down, and can keep your wits about you enough to remember to say it, (you should practice it ! It is THAT important !) this is what you say:
"IS THAT CIVIL CONTEMPT OR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT, JUDGE?" (You wait for a response on the record - do not talk until he answers and if they pause this LONG pause is on the record that he cannot answer you - the silence of a witness answering a question is an admission of truth in a court record and the longer the pause the better. All you want on the record is to make them COMMIT and then you go on, and now you have them caught in the permanent court record.
If he says "CRIMINAL CONTEMPT," you say "WHO MAKES THE CLAIM, WHAT IS THE CRIME AND WHO IS THE INJURED PARTY?" and wait again as long as it takes for him to say something.
If he says "CIVIL CONTEMPT," you say "WHERE IS THE CONTRACT BETWEEN ME AND YOU? I DON'T AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, JUDGE."
NOW you have him acting CRIMINALLY OUTSIDE OF ANY LAWFUL JURISDICTION AND OUT OF IMMUNITY in his own courtroom on the record and here's why. In civil court, EVERYTHING is a CONTRACT and nothing can be done that is not a form of a contract. And ONLY HUMANS CAN LAWFULLY CONTRACT. Every citation, money exchange, order, anything at all is an exchange - a contract - between two humans. The Constitution is the contract between the Sovereigns, We the People with Inherent Rights, to establish a Constitutional State, and the elected or appointed officers thereof. Their contract is their Oath of Office binding them to support and defend the Constitution, upholding and protecting the Rights of the Sovereign, WE THE PEOPLE.
Then, when you say to him "I don't agree to the terms of the contract," he KNOWS he does not have a contract with you. If you have committed no crime he has no authority to arrest you or even be conducting the hearing - he is OUT of his lawful jurisdiction and OUT of his IMMUNITY.
If he says CRIMINAL CONTEMPT, like one judge did, judge R. W., with no lawful Oath of Office on record by the way, he made a FOOL of himself ! He said "IF YOU ASK THAT AGAIN I AM HOLDING YOU IN CONTEMPT OF COURT," I said "IS THAT CRIMINAL OR CIVIL CONTEMPT, JUDGE? and he raged and said "CRIMINAL."
I said "WHAT CRIME HAVE I COMMITTED AND WHO MAKES THE CLAIM? WHO IS THE INJURED PARTY?" He went nuts and started yelling "THE STATE OF OREGON, THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM, THE COURT."
When I said "YOU KNOW THAT ONLY A HUMAN CAN MAKE CLAIM AND THERE IS NO CRIME AND NO INJURED PARTY - YOU KNOW THAT THE STATE CANNOT MAKE A CLAIM," he backed down and sat there red faced (he had already arrested me about three times for speaking during this contempt attempt) and it shut him down.
This was on the third day of the battle in his courtroom/sham jury trial - so after this confrontation backed him down he sat WAY BACK in his chair for three hours and let me make the record, while the jury waited in the back.
MAKING THE RECORD WAS THE ONLY GOAL ANYWAY TO UPDATE THE RECORD IN THE CASE.
Unfortunately, the juries do not understand anything at all, and these confrontations scare them, so all the knowledge of court process and higher law goes right over their heads and they do EXACTLY what the judge LETS them do by the way he manipulates the jury instructions. This judge held his finger to his upper lip and looked like a cadaver for three hours, listening to the record of the crimes of our evidence against the state and his own treasonous contempt of his oath as I outlined what had happened.
That is how you make the Record. You may have to use another trick called OFFER OF PROOF. When they fight you and attack you, and rage, and say you can't say anything in front of the jury, and the Prosecutor interrupting literally EVERY sentence to stop you from speaking for days (I have gone through this !)... you tell the judge I AM GOING TO MAKE AN OFFER OF PROOF FOR MY APPEAL. He sometimes will go in the back room altogether and leave the record on, or he will sit way back and listen while you make the record of your facts without the jury present. Another trick process word is OFFER INTO EVIDENCE. They will let you go around for days and be denied access to Record if you don't say it that way. They may become insane, but, if you do use THEIR words, they know that they have to acknowledge that this is their process, and they use it, so you have to be able to use it too.
Another important phrase to use is RUSH TO JUDGMENT. After going around with them to a certain point and being blocked at all points, you say "ARE YOU TRYING TO RUSH ME TO JUDGMENT?" WOW !! - it works - they sit back and shut up so fast you would not believe - you would think they were shot - supposedly four times in a hearing saying that gets a reversal, but of that I am not sure.
But it is an important TOOL, you say this and it means they are preventing you from putting your evidence on Record as a lawful court and judicial due process requires, and for you to say this as they are doing it is like shooting them in their chair.
I hope people will write these things down and have them in front of them when they are terrified in court - everyone is terrified in the court, even the attorneys, especially when you are bringing truth of this magnitude in there - we say where the truth meets the lie there is fallout - like a neutron bomb, you definitely stir up the hornets nest when you speak the truth in their courtrooms.
The rest of the Process for the People to Access the Courts is the hyperlinked pages on the Sui Juris page.
This is what REALLY happens when you are in court, not what you think will happen or hope will happen. Learning these tools, you will prepared to meet the present evil face to face.
If you are not in court, save this information, you may need it someday, and pass it on to friends who do need it.
Taken with changes from the writings of one who has been there, done that!
Reproduction of all or any parts of the above text may be used for general information.
This HTML presentation is copyright by Barefoot, March 2006
Mirroring is not Netiquette without the Express Permission of Barefoot
Visit Barefoot's World and Educate Yo'Self
On the Web April 20, 2006
Three mighty important things, Pardn'r, LOVE And PEACE and FREEDOM